Archive for the 'God' Category

Faithful Bibile translation in today’s vernacular

Thursday, January 17th, 2008

The last paragraph of an interesting article:

SharperIron » The KJVO Debate in Light of “The Translators to the Reader,” Part 2
The KJV translators may not have the final word on the KJVO debate, but their voices should not be ignored when thinking through these issues. They may not have written their preface by divine inspiration, but their helpful thoughts are worthy of consideration. They certainly reveal how unlikely the translators would be to embrace a KJVO position if they could speak to us in person today. Rather, they would desire to see an English Bible that faithfully conveyed the words of God in today’s vernacular.

My preference is to use the KJV because it is, to my knowledge, the best available English version. While I am comfortable with the King James language by long association, many — probably most — Christians today would find it difficult. Certainly, the KJV does not use today’s vernacular! I would love to see a modern version of the Bible translated word-for-word in the spirit of the KJV using the Received Text, not the thought-for-thought method and Critical Text source of today’s popular versions. Does such a version exist? Not of which I am aware.

If the Drive-by News Media covered the brith of Christ …

Monday, January 7th, 2008

Yes, I know Christmas is over; but in catching up on email, I noticed this satire. It gets a few facts wrong (Marry was a virgin, but not sinless; and the wise men visited a house, not the stable); but what else would we expect from the Drive-bys?

Opinion - StatesmanJournal.com
Cable news covers the birth of Christ

By Tom Purcell

December 25, 2007

Cable News Anchor: We now bring you the latest cable news update on the birth of Jesus Christ. Joining us is our regular panel of experts. Correspondent Peter Jones is standing by in Bethlehem. Peter?

Peter: What we know is that a carpenter named Joseph and his virgin wife, Mary, left Nazareth to travel to Bethlehem. They went to pay a tax decreed by Caesar Augustus. When they arrived in Bethlehem, there was no room at the inn, even though Mary was with child.

Anchor: With child? But you said Mary was a virgin?

Peter: That is one of the more puzzling aspects of this case. Mary claims she is without original sin. She said God chose her to give birth to Jesus, Gods son.

Anchor: That sounds kind of far-fetched. With us today is Dr. Angie Smith of Planned Parenthood. Angie?

Angie: It is biologically impossible for a woman to become pregnant without having relations with a man. In an oppressive society, Mary has been forced to concoct this absurd story to hide the truth about her relations with Joseph.

Read the entire short, but poignant, satire.

Jesus was born in December!

Tuesday, December 25th, 2007

I had always been taught that Christmas was a replacement for a pagan holiday. This biblical proof that Jesus was born about December 25 is very interesting. Merry Christmas everyone!

Lambs are born at the Christmas season « kainos
By John Stormer

Is there evidence that Jesus was born at Christmas??

For too many years, pastors and teachers have said, “Of course we don’t know when Christ was actually born - but the time of year is not really important.” Jehovah’s Witnesses and others have taught that Christmas was “invented” in the fourth or fifth centuries. The supposed goal was giving a “Christian” facade or influence to the wild pagan or Satanic holiday observances during the winter solstice the shortest days of the year.

What’s the real story? Is there any real evidence that Jesus Christ was born at Christmas? A careful examination of a number of seemingly unrelated Bible passages gives clear indication that the Lord Jesus was indeed born at Christmas time. Such study will give new emphasis to what Christ came to do. It will also provide a much deeper appreciation of all that is hidden in the Word of God which can be discovered by those who prayerfully search the scriptures.

Read the entire article!

The “W” in Christmas

Thursday, December 20th, 2007

From a forwarded email I received last year.

Each December, I vowed to make Christmas a calm and peaceful experience. I had cut back on nonessential obligations — extensive card writing, endless baking, decorating, and even overspending. Yet still, I found myself exhausted, unable to appreciate the precious family moments, and of course, the true meaning of Christmas.

My son, Nicholas, was in kindergarten that year. It was an exciting season for a six-year-old. For weeks, he’d been memorizing songs for his school’s “Winter Pageant.”

I didn’t have the heart to tell him I’d be working the night of the production. Unwilling to miss his shining moment, I spoke with his teacher. She assured me there’d be a dress rehearsal the morning of the presentation. All parents unable to attend that evening were welcome to come then. Fortunately, Nicholas seemed happy with the compromise.

So, the morning of the dress rehearsal, I filed in ten minutes early, found a spot on the cafeteria floor and sat down. Around the room, I saw several other parents quietly scampering to their seats. As I waited, the students were led into the room. Each class, accompanied by their teacher, sat cross-legged on the floor. Then, each group, one by one, rose to perform their song.

Because the public school system had long stopped referring to the holiday as Christmas,” I didn’t expect anything other than fun, commercial entertainment - songs of reindeer, Santa Claus, snowflakes and good cheer. So, when my son’s class rose to sing, “Christmas Love,” I was slightly taken aback by its bold title.

Nicholas was aglow, as were all of his classmates, adorned in fuzzy mittens, red sweaters, and bright snowcaps upon their heads. Those in the front row-center stage — held up large letters, one by one, to spell out the title of the song. As the class would sing “C is for Christmas,” a child would hold up the letter C. Then, “H is for Happy,” and on and on, until each child holding up his portion had presented the complete message, “Christmas Love.”

The performance was going smoothly, until suddenly, we noticed her; a small, quiet, girl in the front row holding the letter “M” upside down — totally unaware her letter “M” appeared as a “W.”

The audience of 1st through 6th graders snickered at this little one’s mistake. But she had no idea they were laughing at her, so she stood tall, proudly holding her “W.” Although many teachers tried to shush the children, the laughter continued until the last letter was raised, and we all saw it together. A hush came over the audience and eyes began to widen. In that instant, we understood the reason we were there, why we celebrated the holiday in the first place, why even in the chaos, there was a purpose for our festivities.

For when the last letter was held high, the message read loud and clear:

“C H R I S T W A S L O V E”

And, I believe, He still is. Amazed in His presence… Humbled by His love.

May each of you have a Merry Christmas as you reflect on His Amazing Love for us.

Hope you all have a wonderful Christwaslove holiday season.

The work of Congress

Friday, December 14th, 2007
AFA ActionAlert
Only weeks after voting for a resolution that “recognizes the Islamic faith as one of the great religions of the world,” seventeen Democrats in the U.S. House refused to vote for a Christmas resolution that condemns the worldwide persecution of Christians.

In an act of intolerance toward Christianity (and Christmas), Reps. Alcee Hastings and Debbie Wasserman Shultz have decided that religious discrimination should be the rule of law. By their vote, Christmas is not worthy of recognition by the United States government and should be shunned at all costs.

I am happy to report that my congressman voted neither yea nor nea on either of these silly bills. Is this the kind of thing we pay Congress to do? No! It doesn’t accomplish anything except express the opinion of Congress, for which I could care less!

This kind of bill could be construed as supporting an establishment of religion, contrary to the First Amendment. Don’t get me wrong — I’m not one of those nut jobs who twist the First Amendment to mean that there shouldn’t be nativity scenes on the Town Hall lawn or that Congress shouldn’t start each day with prayer. I’m just saying that these two bills are nothing but a bunch of hot air that take away from the real legislation that Congress is supposed to be debating.

The holiday we celebrate is Christmas

Wednesday, December 5th, 2007
Rasmussen Reports™: The most comprehensive public opinion coverage ever provided for a mid-term election.
As the holiday season begins, 67% of American adults like stores to use the phrase “Merry Christmas” in their seasonal advertising rather than “Happy Holidays.” A Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that just 26% prefer the Happy Holidays line.
There is no gender gap on this question and few demographic differences. From a politically partisan perspective, 88% of Republicans prefer “Merry Christmas” while just 57% of Democrats favor the saying.

So why are retailers pandering to the 26% who prefer “Happy Holidays” at the risk of offending the “Merry Christmas” folks? Perhaps it is because Christians and other traditionalists are far less likely to voice their displeasure than the 26% — most of whom probably already belong to The Offended Club. I’m not advocating big boycotts or noisy demonstrations in front of stores. My take is that Christians and those who do not want to see our cultural traditions overwhelmed by the rising tide of political correctness should politely and firmly communicate to retailers that “Merry Christmas” is a tradition that should be perpetuated.

The Sunday after Thanksgiving, I was wading through the deluge of store circulars included inside my newspaper. Very few retailers used the word Christmas anywhere in their advertising. The most ridiculous was K-Mart as it trumpeted, “All specialty trees on sale,” across a two-page spread of what I would call artificial Christmas trees. None of the descriptions mentioned Christmas. They were called “Slim Aspen Mountain Tree,” “Copper Mountain Tree,” or some such. Search the K-Mart site to see what I mean. It’s funny that a search for “Christmas tree” turns up 31 results, even though K-Mart doesn’t call them that! “Holiday tree” turns of 52 results, and “specialty tree” only turns up 5. The one time I found the word Christmas mentioned on the K-Mart site is on each item page where they explain how to get your order by Christmas Eve.

Even more incredible is that Sears, which is owned by the same company as K-Mart, proudly used the word Christmas on the front of its ad that appeared in the same paper with the K-Mart ad. Try a search for “Christmas” on sears.com and you will find 512 products — most of which seem to use Christmas in their descriptions. Go figure!

If stores want to have a Hanukkah sale or even a Kwanzaa sale, that’s fine with me. Enough with the generic holiday mantra.  We can’t celebrate nothing.  Let’s remember that the main holiday in December here in the USA is Christmas!

Say it load and say it often: Merry Christmas!

Spanking to be banned in Massachusetts

Friday, November 30th, 2007

HOUSE . . . . . . . No. 3922

By Mr. Kaufman of Lexington (by request), petition of Kathleen Wolf for legislation to prohibit the corporal punishment of children. Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities.

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

In the Year Two Thousand and Seven.

An Act prohibiting corporal punishment of children.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:

SECTION 1: Chapter 119 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2004 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after Section 51 B, a new Section 51 B ½ , as follows:—

Section 51B½. CORPORAL PUNISHMENT OF CHILDREN IS PROHIBITED. Corporal Punishment of children violates their rights to safe, secure and respectful care.

This section is intended to actively support nonviolent parenting.

The provisions of this section are intended to eliminate the use of corporal punishment to discipline children, because of the emotional harm and risks of bodily harm associated with corporal punishment of children.

The provisions of this section shall not preclude any adult from using incidental or minor physical contact designed to maintain order and control, or other discipline which does not constitute corporal punishment.

(a) For the purposes of this section, the following words shall, unless the context indicates otherwise, have the following meanings:—

“Child”, any person under eighteen years of age.

“Corporal punishment”, the willful infliction of physical pain or injurious or humiliating treatment.

(b) It shall be unlawful in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for any adult to inflict corporal punishment upon a child.

(c) The infliction of corporal punishment on a child may be a basis for a finding of abuse and neglect.

(d) The provisions of this section shall not preclude any adult from using such reasonable force as is necessary to protect himself and others from imminent, serious, physical harm, including assault by a child, to divest a child of a dangerous instrument, to prevent injury to property, or to remove a child from a life-threatening or injurious situation.

Found on Kevin Thompson’s blog.

Link to the original on the Massachusetts legislature’s site.

Compare the last clause of the above to this verse:

Pro 23:13-14 Withhold not correction from the child: for [if] thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die. Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell.

Hmm. Sounds like spanking is a Bibically-mandated method of saving a child from a life-threatening situation!

Pause and remember

Tuesday, September 11th, 2007

Flag and 9-11 WTC memorial lights

The greatest testament to God’s protection, our nation’s effective leadership, and our troops’ selfless sacrifice is that a similar tragedy has not visited us again these last six years.

God’s been good

Tuesday, September 11th, 2007

Has it been nearly a month since my last post? Ah, well. Things have been rather crazy since Isaac came along. Of course, that was about three months ago; so I’d better get with the program or find a new excuse. My experience is that adjusting to a new baby takes about three months. Now it’s time to regain a “normal” routine!

One of the specials that was sung in church a few times recently is the song, “God’s Been Good.” I’m not sure who wrote it, and I can’t find the lyrics online. The Thompsons sing it, and you can listen to a quick clip here. Anyway, it’s been going through my head a lot lately. I am impressed by the great blessing of God in my life — a beautiful family with three children, health, a steady job, a nice house, two cars, and my needs and most wants satisfied. There are so many around me facing serious needs or terrible sickness, but God is taking such great care of me. I don’t understand it; but I pray I will never forget to praise God for it!

Virtual Pastor

Friday, August 3rd, 2007

pastor

LarkNews.com
When a church subscribes to Virtual Pastor, each person in a congregation helps “shape” their pastor by entering likes and dislikes into a response box during services. This live feedback is fed into the company’s servers and helps to change the pastor’s sermon topics, hair style and more in following weeks. The result is a pastor perfectly tailored to the will of the congregation….Different churches have produced widely differing results. A congregation in Huntington Beach, Calif., adopted the Virtual Pastor model last year. Within weeks their on-screen pastor stopped wearing suits and started wearing Hawaiian shirts, shorts and flip-flops.

“We loosened him up quite a bit,” says one congregant with a laugh.

The pastor also stopped preaching expository sermons in favor of topical sermons like “How to Make Life Matter” and “Surfing through Paul’s Greatest Hits.”

Though the above is just a parody, it reminds me of how often we pressure real-life pastors into preaching what we want to hear.

II Timothy 4:3
For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;